Skip to content

DHS Rightwing Extremism Report 04-07-09

April 14, 2009
Click image to get yourself some

Click through to download images

The Liberty Papers

Homeland Security document targets most conservatives and libertarians in the country

by Stephen Gordon
Remember that now-retracted Missouri Information Analysis Center report which stated that small-government types (specifically Ron Paul, Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin supporters) were potential terrorist threats? According to this new Homeland Security report, all it takes to fit the terrorist profile is to have general anti-government feelings or prefer local/state government to federal control over everything.

The federal Homeland Security Department document entitled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Environment Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment” contains the following definition:

Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration. […]

Go read it all.

dhs-rightwing-extremism-04-07-09
Read the entire PDF doc online.
[Available options: share, e-mail, download and embed]

Also see:
National Guard on Alert for Violence from TEA Party Protesters? @The Jawa Report
“The Modern Militia Movement” a report by the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) PDF @ Scribd

Related:
The Ultimate Tea Party Demonstration Guide
Nationwide Tax Day Tea Party

Advertisements
2 Comments
  1. April 17, 2009 11:52 am

    April 17, 2009 – Washington, DC – U.S. Sens. Jim DeMint, David Vitter, James Inhofe, Tom Coburn, Sam Brownback, Richard Burr and Lisa Murkowski yesterday sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano requesting an explanation of the methodology used by the department to draft its recent controversial report outlining the threat of rightwing extremism for America’s law enforcement.

    [snip]

    A copy of the letter is attached.

    The Honorable Janet Napolitano
    Secretary
    The Department of Homeland Security
    310 7th Street, S.W.
    Washington, DC 20528-0150

    VIA FACSIMILE

    Dear Secretary Napolitano,

    We write today regarding the release of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report entitled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment” and prepared by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch of the Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division.

    While we agree that extremists of all varieties represent a potential threat to the United States, we are troubled by some of the statements included as fact in the report titled above.

    First, your report states that “rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat.” Using the DHS rationale, do you also believe that weapons familiarity and tactical training means local, state, and federal law enforcement personnel, and members of the National Guard, are also being recruited? To suggest that a soldier returning from a combat tour is more prone to join an extremist group is unconscionable and insulting to our brave men and women who risk their lives protecting our freedom.

    Second, the report states that the millions of Americans who believe in the Second Amendment are a potential threat to our national security. Why? Do you have statistics to prove that law-abiding Americans who purchase a legal product are being recruited by so-called hate groups? If so, please present us with DHS’s independent data.

    Third, the report identifies those individuals who believe in such issues as pro-life legislation, limited government, and legal versus illegal immigration as potential terrorist threats. We can assure you that these beliefs are held by citizens of all races, party affiliations and sex, and should not be listed as a factor in determining potential terror threats. A better way to describe them is as citizens exercising their First Amendment rights.

    Also, you listed those who bemoan the decline of U.S. stature and the loss of U.S. manufacturing capability to China and India as being potential rightwing extremists. We would suggest that the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs in the manufacturing industry to foreign countries are not potential terror threats, but rather, honest Americans worried about feeding their families and earning a paycheck. Once again, to classify Americans who have lost their jobs as potential terror threats does a disservice to millions of Americans.

    In closing, we support the mission of DHS in protecting our country from terror attacks and are proud of the many DHS employees who make this possible, in conjunction with our state and local law enforcement. We ask that DHS not use this report as a basis to unfairly target millions of Americans because of their beliefs and the rights afforded to them in the Constitution, and that you provide us with the data that supports the claims listed in the report titled above.

    http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_id=b519c530-a7bb-b041-8d99-92df3ec1aba7

Trackbacks

  1. Ironic Surrealism v3.0™ » Video & Transcript: Lou Dobbs Covers The Disturbing DHS Document Regarding “Right Wing Extremists”

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: